We build the compliance system we wanted to use
Protocore came out of running real governance, risk and compliance programmes — and out of the frustration of holding those programmes together with spreadsheets, shared drives and mailboxes.
Organisations are asked to demonstrate, not assert. A reviewer wants to see how a risk was scored, which control mitigates it, when that control was last tested, what the test concluded, and what happened to the finding it raised. That chain is easy to describe and hard to keep intact across a dozen documents.
Protocore keeps the chain in one place. Risks, controls, policies, oversight, audits, findings and corrective actions all live in the same workspace and reference each other, so the record is complete by construction rather than assembled the week before a review.
How we build
Evidence over narrative
Every register, test and finding is timestamped and attributable, so a review starts from a record rather than a reconstruction.
Methodology first
Scoring, appetite thresholds and control mapping follow recognised methodology instead of a free-text spreadsheet convention.
Built for oversight
Consultancies and group functions run many programmes at once, so isolation between workspaces is a design constraint, not a setting.
Assistance, not automation theatre
Built-in drafting and mapping suggestions are proposals for a human to approve. Nothing is written to a register without sign-off.
Want to see it on your own programme?
We will walk through your registers and show how they would sit in Protocore.